Thursday, September 13, 2012

Michigan State Q & A

 
Here are some questions posed on ND Nation that I though we here at Talking Irish would respond to.  ND Nation Questions are in bold and Talking Irish responses are in italics.

Which team will need reinforcements to stop the run and leave itself vulnerable to the pass?

Both probably will and both will be burned at least once because of it.

Can the Irish offensive line rebound from a poor performance against Purdue?                    

They have to and will.

Which young quarterback will best avoid mistakes and execute in the passing game?         

Not by much but Golson should play a bit better under pressure.

Will MSU’s changing defensive alignments force Notre Dame to burn its timeouts?

Yes, it will also continue to throw Golson off at the line of scrimmage but not as much as last week as he grows and learns in game situations.

Can Cierre Wood reenergize the Irish ground game?

No, that is up to the coaching staff and the offensive line.  Wood will however bring a positive for to the Irish ground attack.

Which kicker will perform best under pressure?

Kyle Bindza.  I have the feeling he is better in pressure situations then common ones (which is not always a good thing).

Will Eifert and his fellow receivers get open against the MSU secondary for big plays?

Yes.  Will they get passed to and catch those passes?  That is a different question.

 

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

What a win will take

Football is a relatively simple ground acquisition game - move the football and prevent your opponent from doing so.   Obviously coaches schemes, coordinator stunts, and even player injuries lead to twists and turns that can very quickly make the game much more complex week to week.  There is an awful lot that can be dissected in this match-up but the key to victory remains simple.

Whichever team has a better game from their offensive line will win the game.  Drawing from that, the team that wins the rushing game will win on Saturday.  Although the Michigan State defense may have only one sack in their first two games, they have also surrendered zero offensive touchdowns.   For the Irish, they must do better than giving up five sacks as they did last week against a good (not as good as Michigan State) Purdue defense.  If you thought Short was good, wait until you get a load (and at 6’7” 280 lbs. he is a good sized load) of defensive end William Gholston.  They must ensure the running game gets back on track with Wood coming back in the fold, and Atkinson needs more touches than he got against Purdue.

As for the Spartans, they have a Heisman candidate caliber running back in Le’Veon Bell who will need to be contained, as their quarterback has potential and is as talented as he is inexperienced (sound familiar?).  If the Irish can push around the Michigan State offensive line enough to pressure Spartan quarterback Andrew Maxwell, they can rattle him into mistakes.  However, if Michigan State’s O-line can give Bell room to work and protect Maxwell, it could be a long day for the Irish.

As for predictions, the winner will not need to score a ton of points (21 could easily win the game), it will be very physical, and the team that has a better game from their offensive line will win the game. 

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Purdue Review: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

PREFACE:  At least once a year I am upset with a Notre Dame win for one reason or another.  However, the win over Purdue left me upset for several reasons. 

Good

The Irish Won.  After the 0-2 start last season, fans should be pretty happy starting this season 2-0.  I caution the ND Nation and be aware that the Spartans and the Wolverines  are coming up fast.

Everett Golson passed for 289 yards, completing 21 passes on 31 attempts with 1 touchdown and 0 interceptions.

The Notre Dame offense completed 24 passes to 9 different receivers for 324 yards.

George Atkinson had a kickoff return for 32 yards.

2 interceptions returned for a total of 47 yards.

Golson’s confidence (which will be under scrutiny after Kelly inserted Tommy Reese) and touchdown dive.

Notre Dame’s defensive front three combining for 4 sacks (Tuitt-2, Nix-1.5, Lewis-Moore-.5)

Bad

The rushing game:  52 net rushing yards, 1.4 yards per rush, 55 yards lost rushing.

3 fumbles (luckily, only 1 lost)

Penalties: 8 for 52 yards, 2 personal fouls on two stupid late hits by two team captains.

The Irish defense allowed Purdue to go 3 for 3 on fourth down.

The number of players that came out at one point or another for “injuries.”

Ugly

The Notre Dame offensive line allowed 5 sacks losing a total of 40 yards.

The way Golson carries the ball (this may be more scary than ugly)

Notre Dame’s final interception as time expired.  Take a knee, end the game, don’t risk a fumble.

Yanking Golson*.  I know it worked out and there are reports of an “injured” hand, but I don’t care.

Irish fans booing Tommy Reese coming into the game.  Although I did not like it and was dazed and confused, don’t boo.

The lack of accessibility of players to the media after the game.  Only Zack Martin and Manti Te’o were made available.

*I am not anti-Reese

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Last Minute Purdue


The Talking Irish staff, much like the Fighting Irish, enjoyed our trip to Ireland but are happy to be back home for Purdue.  Notre Dame will be in the friendly confines of South Bend while we will be comfortable at Shamrock Jack’s.

Not unlike last week against Navy, the keys and game plan for an Irish win over the Boilermakers is relatively simple.

Control the line of scrimmage.  Although Purdue will put up more size, speed, strength and talent than the Irish saw last week on both lines Notre Dame will win this battle.  If the running backs can get past the D-line they will encounter a subpar linebacker crew.  Sticking with three down linebackers (Prince Shembo and Ishaq Williams) will play a more pivotal role at the line.

Complete the short passes.  Especially to backs (running and slot) and tight ends, picking on Purdue’s soft spots at linebacker.  Why challenge the Boilermakers’ talented cornerbacks?

Neaten up the Special Teams.  Missing extra points and not handling punts can take the wind out of our sails real quick.  Although the Boilermakers’ special teams looked even worse last week, watch out for their kickoff return game, which led the nation last year.

Force Purdue quarterbacks (whoever is on the field for the Boilermakers at the time) to feel uncomfortable and don’t let them be athletic or confident.

Even though I have seen some ESPN staff (who at best dislike Notre Dame) put the Irish on upset alert, I like a 20+ win today in South Bend.

Also Note:  Purdue committed FIVE turnovers in their win last week against Eastern Kentucky.  If they do that against the Irish, Notre Dame will win by 40+.

LIKE us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/talkingirishnd

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Purdue Preview


The Purdue Boilermakers should offer a better challenge for the Fighting Irish this weekend for the home opener in South Bend than the Navy Midshipmen did for the opener in Dublin.  Even though the Boilermakers will be a more formidable opponent, I do predict that the Irish will be 2-0 after this Saturday. 

Purdue comes into the season with optimism and for more reasons than having a head football coach named Hope (16-21), now entering his fourth season with the team.  The Boilermakers won their final two games and three of four games last season, including a 26-23 win over Ohio State and finishing with a 37-32 Little Ceases Pizza Bowl Win (Purdue’s first bowl appearance since 2007) over Western Michigan.

Offensively, like the Irish, Purdue has three options at quarterback, where unlike the Irish who want to select on QB and stay with him, Purdue will plan on playing multiple quarterbacks during a game and possibly have two of them on the field at once.  Senior Caleb TerBush won seven games as a starter last year and will probably be the “starter” for Purdue this season. Sixth year senior Robert Marve will definitely see the field after several successful ACL surgeries as he is an athletic talent who can run Purdue’s offense.  Third option Robert Henry, who is also returning after ACL issues, may also line up at receiver and/or running back.

Purdue has a solid offensive line but it does lack depth, which could definitely favor the Irish as they have depth on the offensive line and will be able to keep fresh legs on the field throughout the game to wear down the Boilermakers along the line of scrimmage.  Their running backs and receivers will be a step up from Navy, but nothing too dangerous except against the inexperienced Irish secondary, which will be an issue all season.  Let’s hope that Notre Dame uses these first two games to learn, grow and develop as much as possible in a short period of time.

Defensively, the Boilermakers are experienced across the front line running a 4-3 led by defensive tackle Kawann Short.  Unlike the Irish, Purdue has two strong and experienced cornerbacks that defend the pass well.  I do, however,  like this game to be an opportunity for Tyler Eifert to dominate and for Golson to develop confidence in his (short to medium ) passing game. 

Their high point is their kick return game as sophomore Raheem Mostertt, who led the nation last year with an average of 33.5 yards per kick return, including four for over 70 yards and one touchdown (99 yards).

REMEMBER:

LIKE Talking Irish on Facebook

And

Follow us on Twitter @talkingirishnd

Monday, September 3, 2012

Off and Running


The season is underway and we are off to a very good start (okay, a good start).  Sure, the Irish won by 40 points and dominated 95% of the game, but before we put ourselves in the top 10, remember that it was an undersized, under matched Navy squad.  Of course, there was not much more Notre Dame could have done to look better and they did what they were supposed to do.  But we need to keep things in perspective and stay grounded. 

Let’s start with the offense.  Golson played well for a redshirt sophomore with great expectations starting his first collegiate game.  Overall, he protected the ball and showed confidence in his line, running backs, receivers and apparently himself.  He took his first sack like a pro, which came from an unblocked defender coming in from his blindside at full speed.  He showed poise in the pocket (he may have been overthinking that a bit) and his potential for escape ability.  Areas for improvement include sturdier snaps, cut down on his over reliance on Eifert (he had a very poor pass to Eifert in the end zone in double coverage), and gain Kelly’s confidence to take the shackles off and allow him to run.

The offensive line looked as dominant as they should have.  After last season’s debacle of too many off sides and holding penalties, they looked much more disciplined.  Although the Midshipmen were bigger along both lines than they have been in the past, they were no match for the Irish size and strength.  The holes were big, well defined and stayed open for the backs to have an easy and productive day.

We saw a number of wide receivers take the field, giving them an opportunity to get collegiate game experience even if they did not dominate or even catch a pass.  Golson will benefit from fresh and diverse receivers not only this season but throughout his career.  I look forward to seeing who steps up from game to game throughout the season.

The running backs delivered as hoped for and as expected possibly leaving more questions than answers.  Answers - George Atkinson is and will be something special.  His combination of size and speed will serve him and the Irish well.  Theo Riddick will have a successful senior season thanks to his experience and abilities.  Cam McDaniel got  a lot more touches then I had expected.  I am not sure if that was because the game was in hand and Kelly wanted to rest and protect Atkinson and Riddick, or if Kelly really does see potential in McDaniel and plans on using him in a significant role this season.  Either way, Cam looked solid and should be able to contribute on the offensive side of the ball.  The big question that will most likely expand against Purdue as a similar outcome is expected is will the success of Riddick, Atkinson and McDaniel significantly cut into Cierre Wood’s playing time when he returns.  My prediction: Yes.

The defense did an excellent job defending Navy’s option and controlled the line of scrimmage as expected.  The secondary was definitely suspect and even exposed at times by an inferior passing attack (Navy for some reason did not take advantage of this obvious weakness).  Much like the opportunity for Kelly to work in several players on the offense, he was able to give significant time to players who may need to contribute this season for more than mop-up detail.  We saw a lot of Tony Springman, Chase Hounshell and Kona Schwencke along the line well as a mix of linebackers and defensive backs.  Being able to regularly rotate in effective players will offer fresh legs with little to no drop off in ability.  The highlight of the day was Stephon Tuitt returning a fumble for a touchdown. Everyone, even those of us who have heard about his speed and athleticism, had to be impressed by how easily he outran Navy pressures down the field.

Although the Irish missed an extra point into a swirling headwind, they performed well and should improve as the season continues.  There was an obvious improvement in the punt return game as there was no chance of it being any worse than last year.

As we move on to Purdue, there has to be cautious optimism along with excitement that the Irish will start the season 2-0 with impressive play by both experienced upperclassmen and newcomers with great potential.  Traditionally, I get to watch the replay on Sunday for a more in-depth breakdown but since the Talking Irish staff is in Ireland for the week, we will not see it until Thursday night.  We will prep for a Purdue preview during our transfers and on our flight home.

Some early things to look and hope for in the upcoming weeks based on what we saw firsthand in Dublin, is the team’s confidence and sense of teamwork.  

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Prediction


The Irish will play 12 games this season (excluding a potential bowl match-up),and  that’s as much as I can guarantee for this year.  If I were to predict their record, I would say best scenario 10-2 and worse case, 5-6.  I mark Oklahoma and USC losses (not that they can’t win, they just probably won’t).  More probable is between 9-3 and 7-5 (many are picking 8-4).  Michigan, Michigan State and Stanford are toss up games at best.  6-6 to 5-6 are possible with BYU in a position on the schedule of being a trap game. The Irish also have a history of dropping a game or two that they shouldn’t, and Navy, Purdue, Miami, Boson College, Pittsburgh and Wake Forest know that.

Talking Irish Prediction:  Irish fans will cheer, be disappointed, be optimistic and pessimistic.  We will be exalted to the highest highs with a run back by George Atkinson III, a devastating hit by Manti Te’o or an ankle breaking run by Cierre Wood.  We will then have our hearts broken by an untimely fumble, interception or penalty.  As for a record, we’ll be happy at 8-4 with a middle of the road bowl win and will steal a line from Mets fans, “wait till next year.”

And remember LIKE Talking Irish on Facebook and FOLLOW Talking Irish on Twitter.